Information Services Talk
Information Services Talk
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

M I-5'Per secution ' bug ging a nd counter-sur veillance

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Information Services Talk Forum Index -> Information Services Talk
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Guest






PostPosted: Tue Jan 01, 2008 8:52 am    Post subject: M I-5'Per secution ' bug ging a nd counter-sur veillance Reply with quote

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
-= MI5: bugging and counter-surveillance. -=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

PO: >Did you ever look for the bugs in your house ? If not, why not ? I. mean if
PO: >I thought that was happening to. me, I'd search the place from top to bottom,
PO: >I mean I live there I would know. if anything was out of place. If I was
PO: >really suspicious, I would call in one of those bug detection. teams which
PO: >have those. machines that pick up the transmitted radio waves. This
PO: >reminds me of BUGS, that new programme. on BBC1 on

That's exactly what we did. We. went to a competent, professional detective
agency in London,. paid them over 400 quid to debug our house. They used
scanner devices which go to over. 1 GHz and would pick up any nearby
transmitter in that range,. they also checked the phones and found
nothing... but if the tap was at the exchange, then they. wouldn't find
anything, would. they?

CS: >Doesn't this suggest to you that there. are, in fact, no bugs to be found?

You can assume that they've done this sort of thing. to other people in more
"serious" cases, where. they would know the targets would suspect the
presence of electronic surveillance. So they will have developed. techniques
and devices which are not readily detectable either by visual inspection. or
by electronic means. What those techniques might be,. I couldn't guess.

In this case, the existence. of bugging devices was clear from the
beginning, and they "rubbed it in" with what was said. by the boy on the
coach. It was almost. as if they wanted counter-surveillance people to be
called in, who they knew would fail to detect the. bugging devices, causing
loss of credibility to the other things I would have to say relating. to the
harassment.

I did all the. things someone in my situation would do to try to find the
bugs. In addition to calling in professional help. using electronic
counter-surveillance, I. made a close visual inspection of electrical
equipment, plus any. points where audio or video surveillance devices might
have been concealed. Of course, I found. nothing. Normal surveillance
"mini-cameras" are quite noticeable. and require visible supporting
circuitry. It seems. to me the best place to put a small video surveillance
device would be additional. to a piece of electronic equipment such as a TV
or video. It would be necessary to physically break in. to a property to fit
such. a device.

2766
Back to top
  Ads
Advertising
Sponsor


Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Information Services Talk Forum Index -> Information Services Talk All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum



Board Security

80 Attacks blocked

Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group